Does landlord insurance cover malicious damage?

If a tenant intentionally damages a client’s property, money can be taken from the deposit to pay for repairs. But what if the deposit isn’t enough? Is the landlord covered through their landlord insurance for malicious damage?

It depends. Some types of malicious damage to a property itself would be covered in landlord insurance under the building insurance aspect of the policy. And some malicious damage to contents could be covered under contents insurance, if this add-on was purchased.

However, according to NimbleFins, while landlord insurance may cover malicious damage by trespassers, it does not always cover malicious damage by tenants.

Does landlord insurance cover tenant damage?

Tenant damage can be covered by landlord insurance but can come with strict conditions. Accidental damage is usually an add-on to a landlord insurance policy and can be applied to contents insurance, building insurance or both to pay the cost of repair to items the tenant damages by mistake.

However, malicious damage is a little trickier. Malicious damage means harm done with intent. Accidents are not malicious because they were not done on purpose, while malicious damage is a criminal offence. Examples of malicious damage include:

  • Kicking a hole in a door.
  • Arson.
  • Vandalising walls or furniture.
  • Trashing a property or furniture.
  • Ripping out fitted furniture.
  • Smashing a window.
  • Purposely flooding a property.
  • Building a cannabis farm creating structural damage.

While malicious damage is deliberate, not all deliberate acts are done with malicious intent. Hanging pictures on a wall or cutting down part of a tree to make the property more comfortable are deliberate but not done with malice and may not qualify under insurance terms.

If there is a natural disaster such as a hail storm, given there was no malicious act, you can possibly claim the roof repairs on insurance as the damage was a result of an ‘act of god’.

There are two types of malicious damage – that caused by someone not legally allowed to occupy the property, and that caused by a tenant.

The first is usually covered by both building and contents insurance, and can include former or evicted tenants or squatters who won’t leave the property. However, malicious damage by tenants does not always come as standard.

It can be available as an add-on, but some providers do not offer it at all. Conditions are often set for malicious damage by tenants and some insurers do not offer it for tenants they deem as high risk, such as students.

Can you charge a tenant for damages?

A landlord is able to charge tenants for damages and most decide to do this through deductions to the tenant’s deposit. Some do choose to go through the small claims court, especially if the cost of to sort the damage is more than the deposit, but evidence is needed to win a case.

If the tenant’s neglect causes damage to neighbouring properties they are responsible rather than the landlord. Wear and tear happens in all homes and it is not acceptable for a landlord to charge a tenant for this.

Nor is it right to charge a tenant the full price of replacing an item that was already old or has gone through expected deterioration through the tenancy. Examples of wear and tear include scuffs and marks on walls, faded and worn carpets, curtains and furniture and eroded or mouldy mastic in a bathroom.

But damage is more serious and can be determined as such if it is down to neglect or carelessness, such as pet damage to furniture, holes in walls from hanging pictures, cigarette burns or water damage.

Deposits are legally required to be held in a tenancy deposit scheme and when a landlord deducts money from the deposit the tenant has to agree. If there is a dispute, the scheme’s independent adjudicator will make the final decision.

If a landlord takes out accidental damage insurance or contents insurance, it can claim against the cost of repairing or replacing broken items. Accidental damage is just that, and malicious damage is not covered.

Both these types of insurance are usually extra add-ons to a premium and rarely come as standard.

Does Direct Line landlord insurance cover malicious damage?

Direct Line’s standard landlord insurance covers malicious damage to the building structure and contents, but does have some exclusions, according to its terms and conditions.

Direct Line will not meet a claim if the malicious damage was caused by theft, if the property was vacant, the property is in the open, if the property is not locked, was caused by vandals acting in connection with a political organisation, the ending of work, or if the damage was caused by the tenant, employee or criminal. It will also not honour claims if the malicious damage was due to confiscation, requisition or destruction by order of the government or public authority.

All of these exclusions apply whether the damage was to the building or its contents. Direct Line does offer malicious damage by tenants as an additional extra.

This covers damage by the tenant, their family, or anyone else lawfully on the premises, up to the maximum limit in place for the building or contents policy the landlord has chosen. There is a £500 excess for malicious damage claims.

EAN Content

Content shared by this account is either news shared free by third parties or sponsored (paid for) content from third parties. Please be advised that links to third party websites are not endorsed by Estate Agent Networking - Please do your own research before committing to any third party business promoted on our website. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

You May Also Enjoy

Breaking News

Breaking Property News 13/2/26

Daily bite-sized proptech and property news in partnership with Proptech-X.   96% of proptechs fail to get to series A funding – here is why Thought Leadership by Andrew Stanton, CEO Proptech-PR The proptech sector has never been short of ideas. From AI-driven valuations and digital conveyancing to smart buildings and tokenised real estate, innovation in property…
Read More
Breaking News

Landlords unprepared for the Renters’ Rights Act

Three quarters have made no preparations for the end of Section 21, despite major reforms taking effect from May 2026 New research from Inventory Base has revealed widespread lack of preparedness among UK landlords ahead of the first phase of reforms under the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA), due to come into force on 1 May…
Read More
Breaking News

Why capital is staying in London despite a cooling housing market

By Joe Freedman, Head of Origination at ASK Partners London isn’t suffering from a lack of housing demand. It’s suffering from a failure to deliver. New data from Molior underlines the scale of that failure. Just 5,547 private homes broke ground across the capital last year, an 84% drop from a decade ago. Against an…
Read More
Breaking News

The hidden risk of overvaluing your home when moving in today’s market

With many homeowners turning ambitious conversations into tangible moving plans, the start of the year traditionally marks a surge in activity, particularly for families planning for the future. While the property market remains fundamentally healthy, experts at Beresfords say overvaluing property is one issue that continues to undermine the progress of those looking to sell.…
Read More
Rightmove logo
Breaking News

Rightmove launches next phase of AI-powered property search

Rightmove, the UK’s largest property platform, has launched a beta version of AI-powered conversational property search, as it continues to enhance its property search experience. In close collaboration with Google Cloud and built with Google’s Gemini models, conversational search is available via the property search bar on Rightmove’s website homepage. The latest move further expands…
Read More
Breaking News

Should you break things off with your mortgage lender this Valentine’s Day?

As Valentine’s Day approaches, the latest research from award-winning mortgage adviser, Alexander Hall, has revealed that more than half of homeowners approaching the end of a fixed-rate mortgage are currently undecided on their relationship with their lender, despite notable improvements across the mortgage market over the last 12 months. The consumer insight, commissioned by Alexander…
Read More