Four more agents expelled from The Property Ombudsman scheme (and from registration for lettings redress)

Four separate estate and letting agents have been expelled from membership of The Property Ombudsman (TPO) and from registration for lettings redress for two or more years, after failing to pay awards made by the Ombudsman or to comply with parts of the TPO Code of Practice for Residential Letting Agents.

The decision to expel the companies follows complaints made against them by landlords and tenants.  In three of the cases, rent totaling over £9,000 had not been passed to the respective landlords.  The complaints were independently reviewed and upheld by the Ombudsman, who ordered payment of the money to those owed, together with compensation in all the cases.  TPO members are required to comply with any award and/or direction given by the Ombudsman and accepted by the complainants. To date, all four agents have failed to make any payment.

The first agent, Winchester Lettings Ltd, based in south London, was referred to the scheme’s Disciplinary and Standard’s Committee (DSC) after failing to pay an award of £750 made to a landlord who had complained about poor service in a number of areas.  This agent does not appear to be trading any more.

Miaisa Ltd, which traded as Gallery@HD1, a sales and lettings agent based in Huddersfield, was directed to pay £2,312 in rent due to a landlord as well as an additional award of £300 made by the Ombudsman, who upheld all complaints relating to the company. They were also directed to transfer £975 of tenant deposits. At the time the case was referred to the DSC, the company was in a voluntary arrangement with its creditors but is now in liquidation. At one point it had an estimated deficit of nearly £200,000. Another company with the same director had previously traded as Gallery and also gone into liquidation. TPO understands that the director has now set up a new company which is ALSO trading as Gallery.  Contrary to what it has been saying on its website and on Rightmove, it is not a member of TPO.

iBuild Property Management Ltd (which trades as iLettings UK), based in Hull, was ordered to pay an award of £350 in relation to its behaviour towards the complainant and its handling of a complaint. It is not clear whether or not ilettings UK is still trading.

The final agent is Clapham Lettings Ltd (which traded as Nelsons). Clapham Lettings covered only one of the three offices under the Nelsons brand, and no longer seems to be trading. The other Nelsons branches are operated by separate companies with separate TPO membership which is not affected by this decision.

Clapham Lettings Ltd failed to pay awards in two separate cases. The first complaint was by a tenant who said Clapham Lettings had not passed on his deposit or initial rent payment to the landlord. The Ombudsman upheld the complaint and ordered the company to pay over £4,000 to the landlord as well as £250 to the tenant in compensation.  The second complaint was from a landlord owed over £2,800 in rent, which tenants had paid to the agent but the agent had not passed on. As well as ordering Clapham Lettings to hand over the rent, the Ombudsman made an award of £350.

Without registration these companies cannot legally trade as letting agents, and other redress schemes will not allow previously expelled agents to join. Landlords who lease their property with an agent that is not registered with TPO will not be entitled to have their dispute reviewed by the Property Ombudsman, and nor will any tenants renting through an unregistered agent.

Since all or most of the companies in question appear to have ceased trading the decision by the DSC to expel them from membership is unlikely to have any direct effect. However, the cases against them would affect a decision to allow any other company with the same Director to join TPO in the future. Two of the agents have already made an attempt to register as another company. All the agents have been referred to local trading standards departments by TPO.

Gerry Fitzjohn, Chairman of the TPO Board, commented: “Cases like these are rare, with TPO facilitating early resolutions between agents and consumers in a vast majority of cases. However, in all four of these cases, the agents have not co-operated fully and have failed to pay awards made, and in some of the cases, monies owed.

I would like to remind agents of their obligation to co-operate with any investigations by TPO. The Ombudsman requires any evidence they can provide and that is their chance to put across their side of the story. While the vast majority of agents do co-operate, the small number who do not do so, put themselves at greater risk of having a complaint upheld, when The Ombudsman has only the consumer’s evidence to consider. Agents must comply with any award and/or direction made by The Ombudsman against them and pay the Complainant the amount of any such award within the required period for payment.   Cases of non-compliance are taken very seriously and are dealt with by the Disciplinary and Standards Committee of the TPO Council.”

News from: Helen Evison Helen@theinhouseway.co.uk

Christopher Walkey

Founder of Estate Agent Networking. Internationally invited speaker on how to build online target audiences using Social Media. Writes about UK property prices, housing, politics and affordable homes.

You May Also Enjoy

Breaking News

Breaking Property News 5/06/25

Daily bite-sized proptech and property news in partnership with Proptech-X. Demand Rises for Housing and Infrastructure Projects Rising demand for housing, infrastructure and energy projects across Wales has driven continued growth at Lichfields’ Cardiff office, which this year marks 25 years in the capital. The team of 17 planning professionals is one of the largest…
Read More
Breaking News

Construction continues to enjoy a season in the sun

Underlying performance is on the rise during Q.2 2025 Today, Glenigan, one of the construction industry’s leading insight experts, releases the June 2025 edition of its Construction Index. The Index focuses on the three months to the end of May 2025, covering all underlying projects, with a total value of £100m or less (unless otherwise…
Read More
Love or Hate Rightmove
Breaking News

Busiest May for sales agreed since 2021

The latest insights from Rightmove show that it was the busiest May for agreed property sales since 2021, and the busiest out of any month since March 2022 May is typically a busy month in the year for agreed sales, but this year’s figure highlights the improved market conditions, as home-movers carry on following the…
Read More
Breaking News

New anti-money laundering rules now in effect: what landlords need to know

New anti-money laundering (AML) rules came into effect this month, marking a significant change for landlords and the lettings industry as a whole. The new rules mean financial sanctions checks are now required for all lettings, regardless of how much rent is charged. Here, Steve Bond, managing director of residential lettings for Beresfords, explains what…
Read More
Breaking News

Breaking Property News 4/06/25

Daily bite-sized proptech and property news in partnership with Proptech-X.   Stanmore Contractors announces new Stanmore Design House division Stanmore Contractors, the UK’s leading specialist contractor, has today announced the launch of Stanmore Design House, a new division that will provide RIBA Stage 4 and onwards technical design services to its clients – alongside integrated…
Read More
Breaking News

£200 increase in void period penalties for landlords

The latest analysis by Dwelly, one of the UK’s leading lettings acquisition and success planning experts, has found that landlords have been hit with a 26% increase in the cost of void periods in the past year, equivalent to lost income of almost £200. Dwelly analysed average void period data from March 2024 and March…
Read More